Placements pay.
Paperwork doesn’t.
Intake, screening calls, interview scheduling, reference chasing and the compliance file — the work that decides whether a placement happens this week or next.
for this vertical yet
anything is built
before anything else
without a method
Four jobs between a candidate and a start date.
Applicants parsed, not re-keyed
Applications and CVs read into your ATS fields with the gaps named, so a recruiter reviews instead of retyping.
Ambiguous entries are raised, not guessed.
Interviews that actually get set
Candidate availability and client slots matched, invitations sent on approval, and the no-show chased automatically.
The recruiter stops being a calendar.
The chase, on a schedule
Reference requests tracked to a response with polite escalation, and answers filed against the candidate.
Nothing submitted with an empty reference field.
The file that blocks the submission
Right-to-work, certifications and expiry dates checked against what the client actually requires.
Expiring documents flagged before placement, not after audit.
No measured staffing engagement, so no fill-rate or time-to-place claim.
Time-to-place is a metric every agency already tracks, which makes it the easiest one to invent. We will measure yours against your own baseline, and publish the before with the after.
We map your systems and find which of these jobs is costing you the most hours.
We build that one, put it in front of the person who owns it, and time it before and after.
The figure goes on this page, labelled MEASURED, with the method under it. Not before.
The same discipline, on work we have already done.
32 agents, running daily
Two inboxes read on a schedule, deadlines recalculated, documents filed — every number taken off our own logs.
The twenty-hour listing
Preparation modelled from the broker's own task list, arrived at independently within 5% of his estimate.
Portals that have no API
A search box and one record at a time, driven end to end and re-checked against the source page.